Micro Coaxial Cable factory

What are the skin effect limitations in high-frequency micro coaxial cables?

Micro coaxial cables are essential workhorses in modern electronics, carrying high-frequency signals in applications like 5G phones, medical devices, radar systems, and high-speed data links. As signals travel faster, a phenomenon called the ​skin effect becomes a major limiting factor, directly impacting cable performance. Understanding these limitations helps engineers design better systems and select the right cable.

What is the Skin Effect?

Imagine the signal trying to flow through the conductor. At DC or low frequencies, the entire cross-sectional area of the conductor carries the current evenly. As frequency increases, the current is pushed outwards towards the surface or “skin” of the conductor. This effect concentrates the current flow into a progressively thinner layer near the conductor’s surface as the signal frequency increases.

Why the Skin Effect Causes Problems in Micro Coax

1. ​Exponentially Increasing Resistance (Loss): The most direct impact. By concentrating current into a smaller effective area, the AC resistance (also called “conductor loss” or “ohmic loss”) of the cable’s center conductor (and often the shield) ​increases significantly with frequency. This resistance is proportional to the square root of the frequency (R_ac ∝ √f).
   • ​Consequence: Signal ​attenuation (loss of signal strength) rises dramatically at higher frequencies, limiting usable cable length or requiring signal boosting.
2. ​Shrinking Effective Conductor Size: The depth where current flows effectively (skin depth δ) gets thinner. For copper at 1 GHz, skin depth is about 2 µm. At 10 GHz, it’s around 0.66 µm. A typical micro coax center conductor might be 0.5mm (500 µm) in diameter. Most of the interior metal becomes useless for carrying high-frequency current, acting mostly as support.
   • ​Consequence: ​Larger center conductors aren’t always better at high frequencies. Beyond a certain diameter (relative to the skin depth), increasing size provides diminishing returns in loss reduction.
3. ​Dependence on Conductor Material: The inherent resistivity (ρ) of the conductor material directly impacts skin depth (δ ∝ √ρ). Higher resistivity materials exhibit worse skin effect losses. Copper is standard, but silver offers slightly lower loss. Gold plating often protects against corrosion but has higher resistivity than copper.
   • ​Consequence: Choice of conductor plating and base metal matters significantly for minimizing loss at very high frequencies. Silver plating can offer measurably better performance over bare copper or gold plating on copper.
4. ​Increased Sensitivity to Surface Imperfections: Since almost all current flows very near the surface, imperfections like roughness, scratches, or oxidation on the conductor surface have an outsized negative impact.
   • ​Consequence: Conductor ​smoothness is critical in high-performance micro coax. “Skin effect roughness” can substantially increase measured loss beyond the theoretical minimum, especially above a few GHz. Manufacturing precision is paramount.
5. ​Interaction with Dielectric Loss: While skin effect loss dominates conductor loss, micro coax loss also has a component from the dielectric material insulating the center conductor. As frequencies rise into the multi-GHz and beyond, dielectric loss also increases. The combination of these two loss mechanisms creates very high total attenuation.
   • ​Consequence: Material selection for both the conductor ​and the dielectric (like PTFE, FEP, or specialized foams) becomes crucial for minimizing overall high-frequency loss.

Key Limitations & Design Implications

• ​Maximum Usable Frequency / Bandwidth: The severe increase in loss beyond a certain frequency point limits the practical bandwidth a specific micro coax design can handle over a useful distance.
• ​Power Handling: Higher resistance means more power dissipated as heat within the cable itself. This limits the RF power the cable can handle before overheating, especially critical in power amplifier feeds.
• ​Length Constraints: To maintain sufficient signal strength at the receiver, high frequencies force the use of shorter cables due to the rapid accumulation of skin effect loss.
• ​Shield Design: The shield’s effectiveness, especially at high frequencies, is impacted by its own skin effect. Braid density (coverage %), foil quality, and the choice between braid-only, braid-foil, or double-braid designs are critical to minimizing signal leakage (loss) and external interference pickup.

Mitigating Skin Effect Limitations

While skin effect is a fundamental physical limitation, engineers mitigate its impact:

1. ​Optimal Conductor Material & Plating: Using low-resistivity conductors (copper) with high-conductivity plating (silver) and ensuring smooth surfaces.
2. ​Advanced Dielectrics: Using low-loss tangent dielectric materials (e.g., PTFE, specialized foams) to minimize the dielectric loss component.
3. ​Precision Manufacturing: Controlling conductor smoothness and concentricity to theoretical ideals.
4. ​Material Enhancements: Using silver-coated copper (SCC) or silver-coated copper-clad steel (SCCS) cores where strength or cost requirements dictate.
5. ​Realistic Cable Selection: Choosing micro coax specifically designed and rated for the target frequency band and loss budget.
6. ​Shorter Cable Runs: Placing high-frequency circuitry closer together.
7. ​Cable Matching: Ensuring correct coaxial cable impedance and proper termination impedances throughout the link.

Conclusion

The skin effect is an unavoidable physical principle that places significant limitations on the performance of micro coaxial cables at high frequencies. It causes rapidly increasing signal loss (attenuation), forces trade-offs in conductor size, demands highly conductive and smooth materials, increases sensitivity to manufacturing defects, and interacts with dielectric loss. Understanding these limitations is essential for selecting the right micro coax cable for demanding, high-frequency applications, designing systems within realistic performance boundaries, and appreciating why some cables command a premium for GHz performance.