Micro Coaxial Cable factory-(FRS)

Micro Coaxial vs. Microstrip: Choosing the Right High-Frequency Transmission Line - Micro Coaxial Cable factory-(FRS)

Micro Coaxial Cable-Micro Coaxial Cable factory-(FRS)-FRS

 

INFO

In high-speed electronics and radio frequency (RF) designs, reliably moving signals from point A to point B without distortion or loss is critical. Two common ways to achieve this are ​Micro Coaxial (Micro-Coax) Cables and ​Microstrip Transmission Lines. While both serve the same fundamental purpose, they differ significantly in structure, application, and performance. Understanding these differences is key to selecting the best option for your project.

Core Structure & Concept:

  1. Micro Coaxial Cable:
    • Structure: Mimics a miniature version of a standard coaxial cable. It consists of:
      • A central ​inner conductor (solid or stranded wire) carrying the signal.
      • A dielectric ​insulator tightly surrounding the inner conductor.
      • An outer ​braided or solid shield (the “outer conductor”).
      • An outer ​jacket for physical protection (optional).
    • Concept: A self-contained, shielded cable. The signal travels along the inner conductor, while the shield provides a well-defined return path and contains the electromagnetic fields entirely within the cable structure. It’s a physically separate component.
  2. Microstrip Transmission Line:
    • Structure: Constructed directly on the printed circuit board (PCB):
      • A ​signal trace of controlled width etched on the top layer of the PCB.
      • A solid ​ground plane on the adjacent layer directly underneath the signal trace.
      • The ​PCB substrate dielectric material separating the trace and the ground plane.
    • Concept: An integrated, planar transmission line. The signal propagates along the surface trace. The ground plane underneath provides the primary return path and reference. The electromagnetic field is concentrated between the trace and the ground plane, but part of the field extends into the air above the trace.

Key Differences:

Here’s a breakdown of how they compare across critical factors:

FeatureMicro Coaxial CableMicrostrip Transmission Line
StructureMiniature cable assembly (inner conductor, insulator, shield, jacket)PCB Etched trace over dielectric over ground plane
IntegrationExternal component; requires connectors/solderingIntegral part of the PCB fabrication
ShieldingExcellent. Full 360° shielding prevents signal radiation and external interference.Limited. Ground plane shielding on one side only; susceptible to radiation/crosstalk above and to the sides.
Signal IsolationExceptional. Signals in different micro-coaxes are highly isolated from each other.Good within layer, Poor across layers. Highly dependent on spacing, guard traces, and via shielding.
Loss @ High Freq.Generally Lower. Especially at higher frequencies (> 10s of GHz), lower dielectric loss and controlled impedance result in less signal attenuation per unit length.Generally Higher. Dielectric losses in the PCB material and skin effect losses become significant at very high speeds/frequencies.
Impedance ControlTight & Stable. Manufactured with precise geometry for specific impedance (e.g., 50Ω, 75Ω).Good, but Varied. Requires careful trace width design and relies on consistent dielectric thickness/constant. More susceptible to etching variations and nearby structures.
EMI RadiationVery Low. Fields are contained within the shield.Noticeable. Fields extend above the trace; can radiate and cause interference or emissions issues.
CrosstalkVery Low. Excellent shielding minimizes coupling.Higher Risk. Requires careful trace spacing, ground plane management, and sometimes guard traces to minimize coupling between adjacent traces.
DispersionLower. Generally better performance for broadband signals.Higher. Velocity changes slightly with frequency, potentially distorting very broadband signals.
Complexity/CostHigher. Cost per unit length + cost of connectors + assembly complexity.Lower. Minimal added cost over standard PCB fabrication (cost is in design effort and potentially higher-end materials).
Routing FlexibilityHigh & Low. Flexible cables route freely around the board, but connectors/terminations restrict direct point-to-point integration.Integrated & Constrained. Routing is limited to the PCB surface layers; requires vias to change layers, impacting signal integrity.
DensityLower. Cables occupy physical space above the board; challenging to route densely.Higher. Enables dense routing of traces on the PCB surface layer(s).
Best Suited ForExternal connections, connecting instruments, high-frequency/high-isolation requirements between boards/modules, extreme noise environments.On-board routing for high-speed digital (PCle, USB, DDR, Ethernet) & RF signals (up to 10s of GHz), cost-sensitive designs where PCB integration is paramount.

When to Choose Which?

  • Choose Micro Coaxial When:
    • You need ​excellent shielding and signal isolation (critical in RF, sensitive analog, noisy environments).
    • You are connecting ​separate units, instruments, or boards/modules.
    • You are dealing with ​very high frequencies (> 25-40 GHz) where microstrip losses become prohibitive.
    • Minimizing ​EMI emissions and susceptibility is absolutely critical (medical, aerospace, defense).
    • Board space for routing is less constrained, or flexibility around the board is needed.
  • Choose Microstrip When:
    • You need to ​route high-speed or RF signals directly on a PCB.
    • Cost and ease of manufacturing are significant factors.
    • Achieving ​high component density is essential.
    • Signals operate at frequencies ​below ~25-40 GHz (depending heavily on PCB material – advanced materials extend this limit).
    • Good isolation can be managed with ​sufficient spacing and good PCB design practices.

The Blurring Line: Embedded (Coaxial-like) Stripline

While microstrip dominates PCBs and micro-coax dominates external cabling, there’s overlap. Advanced designs might use “Stripline” (traces sandwiched between two ground planes in inner PCB layers) for better shielding than microstrip. Newest techniques like ​embedded coaxial routes channels within the PCB with barrel-shielded vias, offering integrated micro-coaxial-like performance directly on the board for speeds above 50 GHz.

Conclusion:

Micro coax cables and microstrip transmission lines are both vital tools. Micro coax offers superior shielding and signal integrity performance, especially at very high frequencies and for external connections, but at a higher cost and complexity. Microstrip provides a cost-effective and highly integrated solution for routing high-speed signals directly on PCBs, requiring careful design to mitigate its inherent shielding limitations and losses at very high frequencies. The best choice depends entirely on your specific application’s performance, integration, cost, and environmental requirements.

FAQ

NEWS

More Products

Our factory offers high-quality products at competitive prices

Industrial Micro-Coaxial Wiring

Industrial Micro-Coaxial Wiring

Meta Description: Discover the advanced features and benefits of Industrial Micro-Coaxial Wiring—engineered for precision, durability, and high-speed signal transmission in industrial environments. ​What is Industrial Micro-Co.

LVDS Micro Coaxial Cable

LVDS Micro Coaxial Cable

In LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling) display systems, Micro-coaxial Cable (also referred to as Micro Coax Cable) stands out as an optimal solution for high-resolution, high-reliability signal transmission. Designed to meet the str.

Contact Us

Feel free to reach out to us for any inquiries or orders.

Call Us

Have a question? Give us a call!

+861881875005

Email Us

Send us an email and we'll get back to you soon.

sales@custom-cable-assemblies.com
       
Home Products Contact