Coaxial vs. Non-Coaxial Cables
- What Defines a Coaxial Cable?
A coaxial cable (“coax”) has a concentric layered design that ensures signal integrity:
Central Conductor: A solid or stranded copper core for signal transmission.
Dielectric Insulator: Surrounds the conductor, maintaining impedance (typically 50Ω or 75Ω).
Metallic Shielding: Braided copper or aluminum foil to block electromagnetic interference (EMI).
Outer Jacket: Protective PVC or thermoplastic layer.
Examples: RG-6 (TV/internet), LMR-400 (RF systems), semi-rigid coax (aerospace).
2. What Are Non-Coaxial Cables?
Non-coaxial cables lack the concentric shielding of coax and include:
Twisted Pair Cables:
Pairs of insulated copper wires twisted together.
Types: Unshielded (UTP) for Ethernet, shielded (STP) for industrial use.
Ribbon Cables:
Flat, parallel conductors used in computers and printers.
Fiber Optic Cables:
Glass/plastic fibers transmitting light signals (not electrical).
Examples: Cat6 (UTP), SATA ribbon cables, single-mode fiber optics.
3. Key Differences Between Coaxial and Non-Coaxial Cables
Feature Coaxial Cables Non-Coaxial Cables
Structure Concentric layers with shielding Twisted pairs, flat ribbons, or fiber cores
Impedance Fixed (50Ω, 75Ω) Varies (e.g., 100Ω for Cat6)
Signal Type Analog/RF signals, digital over RF Baseband digital (twisted pair), light (fiber)
Bandwidth Up to 100 GHz (semi-rigid coax) Up to 10+ Tbps (fiber optics)
EMI Resistance High (due to shielding) Low (UTP), moderate (STP), immune (fiber)
Max Distance 500+ meters (with amplifiers) 100m (Cat6), 40+ km (fiber)
Cost Moderate to high Low (twisted pair), high (fiber)
4. Signal Integrity and Performance
A. Coaxial Cables
Strengths:
Excellent EMI shielding for noise-free RF/analog signals.
Low attenuation at high frequencies.
Durable in harsh environments (e.g., outdoor TV antennas).
Weaknesses:
Bulkier and less flexible than UTP or ribbon cables.
Limited data rates compared to fiber optics.
B. Non-Coaxial Cables
Twisted Pair:
Pros: Lightweight, cost-effective for short-range data (e.g., LAN).
Cons: Susceptible to crosstalk and EMI without shielding.
Fiber Optics:
Pros: Ultra-high speed, EMI immunity, long-distance capability.
Cons: Fragile, complex termination, higher cost.
5. Applications: When to Use Which?
Coaxial Cables Are Ideal For:
RF Systems: Satellite dishes, radio antennas, radar.
Broadband Infrastructure: Cable TV, DOCSIS 3.1 internet.
Medical Imaging: MRI machines requiring EMI-free signals.
Military/Aerospace: Ruggedized coax for avionics and drones.
Non-Coaxial Cables Excel In:
Data Networks: Ethernet (Cat6/Cat7), data centers (fiber optics).
Consumer Electronics: Printer ribbons, internal PC wiring.
Telecom Backbones: Long-haul fiber optic networks.
Industrial Automation: Shielded twisted pair (STP) for motor controls.
6. Hybrid Solutions
Some systems combine both cable types for optimized performance:
Fiber-Coaxial Networks (FTTH): Fiber backbones with coaxial “last mile” to homes.
Aircraft Systems: Coax for radar + twisted pair for in-flight entertainment.
7. Cost and Installation Considerations
Coaxial Costs:
RG-6:
0.20
–
0.20–0.50 per foot.
LMR-400:
1
–
1–2 per foot.
Connectors: F-type (cheap), SMA (costly for high-frequency).
Non-Coaxial Costs:
Cat6 UTP:
0.10
–
0.10–0.30 per foot.
Single-mode fiber:
1
–
1–3 per foot + expensive transceivers.
Installation Complexity:
Coax: Requires precision stripping and crimping.
Fiber: Needs fusion splicing and polishing.