Micro Coaxial Cable-Micro Coaxial Cable factory-(FRS)-FRS
Coaxial cables have played a pivotal role in the evolution of network communication systems. Among them, Thicknet (Thick coaxial cable) and Thinnet (Thin coaxial cable) were widely used in early Ethernet implementations, particularly in the 1980s and 1990s. Though both belong to the coaxial family, they differ significantly in terms of physical properties, performance, and application scenarios.
Diameter: Thicknet cables are larger, typically around 0.5 inches (12.7 mm) in diameter.
Material: They consist of a solid copper core, thick insulation, and an outer shielding layer.
Weight: Due to their bulkier construction, Thicknet cables are heavy and less flexible.
Thinnet (10BASE2):
Diameter: Thinnet cables are slimmer, approximately 0.25 inches (6.35 mm) in diameter.
Material: They use a stranded copper core with thinner insulation and shielding.
Weight: Thinnet is lighter and more flexible, making it easier to handle during installation.
2. Transmission Performance
Signal Attenuation:
Thicknet cables experience lower signal attenuation over long distances due to their robust shielding and thicker conductor.
Thinnet cables suffer from higher attenuation, limiting their effective range.
Maximum Segment Length:
Thicknet: Supports segments up to 500 meters without requiring a repeater.
Thinnet: Limited to 185 meters per segment.
Data Rate:
Both cables were designed for 10 Mbps Ethernet (hence “10BASE5” and “10BASE2”). Their bandwidth capabilities are identical, but Thicknet’s longer range made it suitable for backbone networks.
3. Installation and Maintenance
Thicknet:
Installation is complex due to the cable’s rigidity. It often requires vampire taps (piercing connectors) to attach devices.
A specialized tool called a cable crimper is needed to install connectors.
Maintenance is challenging, as faults in the thick cable are harder to locate and repair.
Thinnet:
Easier to install due to its flexibility. Devices connect via BNC T-connectors in a daisy-chain topology.
Requires minimal tools for termination, reducing setup time and cost.
However, a single break or loose connector in the chain can disrupt the entire network.
4. Cost and Applications
Thicknet:
Higher material and installation costs due to its bulk and specialized hardware (e.g., vampire taps).
Primarily used as backbone cabling in large-scale installations like campuses or industrial facilities.
Thinnet:
More cost-effective and popular for smaller networks, such as office LANs or home setups.
Its affordability and simplicity made it a go-to choice before the rise of twisted-pair cables (e.g., Cat5).
5. Limitations and Obsolescence
Thicknet:
Bulky design and high cost led to its decline as fiber optics and twisted-pair cables offered better performance and scalability.
Rarely used today except in legacy systems.
Thinnet:
Susceptibility to signal interference and segment length restrictions made it obsolete.
Replaced by UTP (Unshielded Twisted Pair) and fiber optics in modern networks.
Our factory offers high-quality products at competitive prices
KEL’s Micro Coaxial Cable solutions are at the forefront of modern electronic connectivity, offering exceptional performance in high-speed data transmission, miniaturization, and reliability. These connectors are integral to various.
In LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling) display systems, Micro-coaxial Cable (also referred to as Micro Coax Cable) stands out as an optimal solution for high-resolution, high-reliability signal transmission. Designed to meet the str.
Feel free to reach out to us for any inquiries or orders.
